Fire Science and Cognitive Dissonance in Arson Investigations | Academic Analysis #3515124 (License: Personal Use)

This document excerpt critiques the premature conclusion that the Willingham fire was intentionally set, highlighting how traditional arson indicators-like pour patterns, crazed glass, and V-shaped soot-were misinterpreted. It connects this forensic misjudgment to broader psychological phenomena, particularly cognitive dissonance, referencing Jerome Groopman’s work on professional error defense mechanisms.

Used in academic or legal education contexts-e.g., criminology, forensic science, or psychology courses-to illustrate real-world consequences of confirmation bias and flawed investigative reasoning. Matches user intent for research, case study analysis, or understanding expert error dynamics.